Wednesday, March 19, 2008

What's In a Name?

The University of North Carolina School of Public Health in Chapel Hill is planning to change its name to the Dennis and Joan Gillings School of Global Public Health in September 2008.

So what? Why should anyone care?

There are several reasons. Perhaps the most basic argument is that the University of North Carolina is a public institution, which means that it belongs to the people of North Carolina. In fact, UNC is the oldest public university in the United States and UNC School of Public Health was the first school of public health to be established at a state university. Short of honoring the school's founder, renaming a public institution in recognition of any individual, couple, or family disenfranchises the taxpayers, students, and alumni who fund the university every year.

In response to the fact that only about 30% of UNC School of Public Health's $104 million per year budget is derived from state funds, why take any action that might alienate donors? Past, present, and future donors should take offense to the planned name change as it bestows a greater importance upon a single major donor rather than the collective of donors who give varying amounts to the school, some probably year after year. I realize that $50 million is a lot of money, but that's less than half of the school's budget for just one year. You also have to consider the $36.6 million in research funding that the school secured through NIH grants in 2005 alone. And if anyone else was to consider making another multi-million dollar donation to the school, have the administration not set a precedent and should they not expect that the name of the school would be changed once again, in recognition of their donation? If the administration at UNC feels that recognizing donors is important, they should limit dedications to buildings, centers, scholarships, faculty endowments, and the like, not school names.

If you've ever stepped foot onto the Carolina campus or if you have ever been to a game in which the Tar Heels have played, then you know what Carolina pride is all about. Changing the name of the School of Public Health may disrupt the way that students, faculty, and alumni identify themselves. I have yet to talk to one person who anticipates being proud to say that they are an alum of Gillings, although most alumni of the School of Public Health are very proud of the fact that they graduated from UNC or Chapel Hill, as they often refer to the school. I would no sooner change the school colors or mascot, than would I change the school's name. What would you say if UNC had announced that Ramses' new name is Dennis or that Carolina blue is to be replaced with Gillings green? Furthermore, if the administration wants UNC School of Public Health to continue to stand apart from other schools like Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and Columbia University's Mailman School of Public Health, then why do exactly what they're doing by renaming the school after a benefactor? Do we really want to be know for some wealthy donor, or do we want to be known for our diversity of alumni and faculty who are leaders in public health?

After considering all of these arguments against the name change, think about this. It has been called to my attention that changing the name of the School of Public Health is only a symptom of a larger problem. Several people are concerned about the influence of industry and private dollars on the University, and rightfully so. Public-private partnerships are rife with ethical concerns and conflicts of interest. New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg's donations of over $300 million to Johns Hopkins University is one thing, but at least he doesn't have a financial interest tied to the research of Hopkins' School of Public Health in the way that Dennis Gillings does with respect to the pharmaceutical and biotechnology contract research organization, Quintiles, and UNC.

These are just a few of the serious concerns and reservations that I have with regard to the "Gillings Gift" and the UNC School of Public Health name change. I'm sure that you can come up with others, and I hope that you will choose to share them, just click on the "comments" link below.

14 comments:

Anonymous said...

As an alum I really agree with Dustin that the name of the whole school should not be changed. $50 million is a wonderfully large donation, and I am very grateful to the Gillings for their generosity, but NC taxpayers have put much more than that towards our school. That amount would be a significant portion of an individual building's costs and it seems to me very appropriate to name buildings after big donors. But it is overkill to name the whole school for a donation that is such a small portion of a single year's costs. We are a public university. We shouldn't change our name for a private donation. Thanks Dustin for raising this issue!

Mariana Garrettson MPH '05

Anonymous said...

Increasingly, the ties between industry and academia are blurred, and as a medical student, I wonder if it is just that in medicine, because these conflicts of interest have a more visible, immediate impact on patients, that we pay more attention.

I think our schools should set a standard higher than that set forth by athletic stadiums, who equate a monetary donation with re-naming. Academic institutions that produce knowledge should reward and name themselves accordingly - to name a school on the basis of a monetary contribution suggests that $$$$$ is all that our institutions of higher learning stand for.

Sincerely,
Anthony Fleg
National PharmFree Coordinator, American Medical Student Association
www.pharmfree.org

Anonymous said...

I am grateful for support for the SPH, regardless of the source. However, I truly believe that our name should reflect the school's mission or the University itself -- not our benefactors.

Kelly Quinn said...

Dustin has provided an important service to the SPH community and especially to fellow students in creating this blog and making easily accessible what information exists regarding the imminent School name change and the nature of and potential influence of the Gillingses’ donation. I am unaware that there has been any student involvement in the development of the SPH’s relationship with the Gillingses, and there is no student membership on the Acceleration Advisory Committee. This, and my recollection of being invited to the SPH atrium in February 2007 for the unveiling of a surprise, make me question the transparency of the planning process and opportunities for future student involvement. Also, thanks to Dustin for creating a venue to discuss the important issue of corporate influence in universities.

Many of us are appreciative of the Gillingses’ generous personal donation. As Dean Rimer stated in her blog, relationships with donors can be developed responsibly and ethically. I do not disagree that gifts are critical to our goals, and I suspect that most students, passionate about their particular research and practice agendas, are well aware of both the pressing concerns regarding the public’s health and the challenges of funding global health initiatives. UNC students, it seems to me, are invested not only in global health but in local issues that affect their training, their departments, and SPH at large. Surely we all have some opinion about a school name change? Perhaps I’ve simply not been a participant in ongoing discussions, and students are indeed having a dialogue, but I fear that the provision of only faculty and staff forums have left students and alumni unheard as UNC officials and the Board of Trustees developeded and approved the final agreement.

Would you prefer to study at the School of Public Health at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill or the Dennis and Joan Gillings School of Global Public Health?

Kelly Quinn
Doctoral Student
Department of Epidemiology

eke said...

I was curious so I looked into other schools of public health with the names of individuals.

The Joseph L. Mailman school of public health at Columbia was named in 1998 for a philanthropist who died in 1990 and made contributions to the school. His money, made from knives and later aviation and motor companies, went towards substial sponsoships of arts and education in this country.

There is also the Rollins School of Public Health at Emory, named for O. Wayne Rollins, who made his money in various business ventures including radio, television, pest control, oil fields, trucks, boats and real estate.

Finally, the Bloomberg School of Public Health at Johns Hopkins, named for Michael Bloomberg, mayor of New York, who made his money in software and radio.

Columbia, Johns Hopkins, and Emory are private schools, so maybe they doesn't deserve the same kind of scrutiny as UNC, which receives much of its money from North Carolina.

However, even if we put those schools under the microscope, renaming a school of public health in honor of funding from the estate of mulifaceted philanthropists seems less threatening than naming the school for someone with a financial stake in pharmaceuticals.

Emily Eidenier, MPH Candidate, HBHE

Anonymous said...

I agree with Dustin. I believe changing the name of school will not be conducive to our school’s future reputation as well as values. Due to the fact that UNC School of Public Health was the first state university to establish a school of public health in this country, I feel it is very stupid and irrational to change its school name and leave out “NC” as a part of school name.
As a student of the university, I sincerely admire Gillings family for this generous gift to the university; however, I would’ve appreciated more if their true intention was to help support the future of public health rather than to use our university as another marketing device for their own future benefit. After all, it is a “GIFT” to the university, not a trade-off.

Anonymous said...

I am quite sure that NONE of the Gillings donation was earmarked for building funds. FYI.

Anonymous said...

What do you think benefits the public's health more -- $50 million, or a bunch of overly-idealistic grad students whining about a name? Maybe if you all spent half the time working on improving the public's health that you spend writing these pseudo-noble speeches, we would not have needed the gift.

Are you seriously saying that the school should've turned down the Gillings gift only on the principle that science shouldn't be influenced by money? What universe do you live in? Every single one of us is influenced by things other than "public health" in decisions we make (whether it's money or our CV). Money influences almost everything -- it's called life. But Dean Rimer is right when she says that we can accept money from the private sector and still use it ethically. A lot of you seem to think that private money is inherently evil.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous 5:40pm.

Perhaps you should take a better look at the posts above (One idea: actually read them). No one is opposed to the gift. But there is definitely a conflict of interest inherent in this situation. And the fact that a public school of public health is set to be renamed after the CEO of a pharmaceutical company does raise concerns to the community since it is our tax money that funds the school.

Anonymous said...

I'm sorry, maybe it was wishful thinking on my part. I was hoping you all at least were worried about something more than a name. I've had conversations with other students who actually were concerned with how the money is spent, and didn't just wax poetic about 3 letters. If the name is really your only concern, then you definitely need to find a hobby.

Unknown said...

Those of you who are horrified that 'UNC' is being dropped from the school name might want to check the school website:

"Celebrate with us when our name becomes UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health."

Anonymous said...

I think we must have discussion, but also must make sure the facts are correct. The name will be The University of North Carolina Gillings School of Public Health. UNC will not be removed from the name. I am not opposed to the insertion of Gillings into the name, but there must be transparency in the whole process. I think we must be shown the signed agreement with the Gillings. A $50 million gift from a former professor is great, but I feel it must be handled appropriately.

Anonymous said...

Actually it will be The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Gillings School of Global Public Health.

Anonymous said...

Honestly, I'm not really upset about adding Gillings to the name, lots of programs are named for their largest benefactors. What irked me is the addition of "global" to the name. First of all, I feel like it is in there purely for marketing because global is very trendy these days. Everyone knows that people do research based all over the world, there is no need to flaunt it. Plus, as someone who's research is decidedly not-global (very local), and talking with other people who also do more local/lab based research, I feel that naming it The Global School of Public Health diminishes those who are not working on international problems.